Re: Case sensitivity in Kerberos principal names.

On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 17:19 +0100, Bjoern Tore Sund wrote:
> Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 12:31 -0500, Santy, Kimberly M wrote:
> >> I've got commercial NAS device, acting as a CIFS server.  It's a member
> >> of an AD domain that only accepts Kerberos Auth.  Windows clients are able
> >> to authenticate and gain access to the CIFS shares without problems.
> >>
> >> Other clients--MacOS's SMB file system, the Linux CIFS VFS, and smbclient--
> >> all fail with an error along the lines of:
> >>
> >>    spnego_gen_negTokenTarg failed: KDC reply did not match expectations
> > As far as I've understood, CIFS VFS doesn't have support for Kerberos at
> > all yet. Are you sure you're not confusing it with the older SMBFS 
> Kerberos support in mount.cifs is an easy assumption to make, given that 
>    the sec=krb5 option is documented in the man page.  
That's all there is at the moment. It parses the option, but doesn't
attempt to do anything yet, so I doubt you could even get an error like
that one out of it :-)

Cheers,

Jelmer
-- 
Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@xxxxxxxxx> - http://samba.org/~jelmer/

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
linux-cifs-client mailing list
linux-cifs-client@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client