On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 11:22 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:37:44PM +0100, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 21.03.2005, 15:22 +0100 schrieb abuas_z:
> > > I must add, that generally new drivers in CVS are better than 0.13
> > > to usual work, they support wireless tools, iwlist scanning, etc,
> > > etc. But monitoring with kismet in newest drivers is practically
> > > impossible (that wrote me kimset developer). And unfortunately there
> > > is no monitor patch for orinoco-usb devices...
> >
> > To add another caveat - unfortunately 0.15* is totally unusable on arm
> > linux platforms (which is the #1 PDA platform) and I'm unable to find
> > out why (see list archives).
>
> Whoa... first I've heard that. I knew some old versions didn't work
> on arm, due to structure alignment issues, but I thought 0.15 was
> clean. Pavel, could those PACKET_OTHERHOST changes you made to the
> header handling have re-introduced a nested structure anywhere?
Hi, David!
I don't think so. Besides, I tested my patches on ARM, and they were
OK.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: 2005 Windows Mobile Application Contest
Submit applications for Windows Mobile(tm)-based Pocket PCs or Smartphones
for the chance to win $25,000 and application distribution. Enter today at
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6882&alloc_id=15148&op=click
|
