osdir.com
mailing list archive

Subject: Bug#339293: New version of spandsp available - msg#00203

List: linux.debian.packages.voip.devel

Date: Prev Next Index Thread: Prev Next Index
On Friday 13 January 2006 10:58, Caio Begotti wrote:
> It works now, but I had to change it a little bit more.
> My files for the SpanDSP plugins are:
> http://caio.ueberalles.net/asterisk/spandsp/

Folks, any new news about it so far?

--
Caio Begotti (caio1982)
http://caio.ueberalles.net


Was this page helpful?
Yes No
Thread at a glance:

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

Bug#344896: marked as done (twinkle doesn't always delete lockfile)

Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:34:36 +0100 with message-id <20060124123436.GA27734@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and subject line Bug#344896: bug fixed. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 11:37:46 +0000 >From pkk@xxxxxxx Tue Dec 27 03:37:45 2005 Return-path: <pkk@xxxxxxx> Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.188]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ErD9F-0003cp-KD for submit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:37:45 -0800 Received: from [194.77.152.226] (helo=[192.168.1.68]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu6) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML29c-1ErD9E0SBB-0002wZ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:37:44 +0100 Message-ID: <43B12784.7080400@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:37:40 +0100 From: Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@xxxxxxx> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: submit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: twinkle doesn't always delete lockfile X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx login:69aec7263999a7b7d9800f1e5ea05378 Delivered-To: submit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: twinkle Version: 0.4.2-1+b1 Twinkle only deletes its lockfile ~/.twinkle/twinkle.lck when closed using the "Quit" entry in the "File" menu. When I just log off from Gnome or when the X server is killed the lockfile remains and twinkle will not start again until the file has been deleted manually. I have seen the same bug in older twinkle versions, too. Philipp --------------------------------------- Received: (at 344896-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jan 2006 12:34:39 +0000 >From master@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tue Jan 24 04:34:39 2006 Return-path: <master@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Received: from 213-84-114-29.adsl.xs4all.nl ([213.84.114.29] helo=capsaicin.mamane.lu) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F1NNe-0002LH-OU for 344896-done@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 04:34:39 -0800 Received: from master by capsaicin.mamane.lu with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <master@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>) id 1F1NNc-0007Dj-R9 for 344896-done@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:34:36 +0100 Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:34:36 +0100 From: Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@xxxxxxxxx> To: 344896-done@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Bug#344896: bug fixed. Message-ID: <20060124123436.GA27734@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> References: <43D61537.5040306@xxxxxxx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43D61537.5040306@xxxxxxx> X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux X-Request-PGP: http://www.mamane.lu/openpgp/rsa_v4_4096.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Version: 0.5-1 On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 12:53:27PM +0100, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: > This bug is fixed in 0.5-1, the version currently in unstable. Closing bug, then. -- Lionel

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

!zNC;R)It20!z(B

$B$*Hh$lMM$G$9!*:#F|=i$a$F;XL>$r<u$1$?5.J}$K(B2$B%7%g%C%H@lMQ(B VIP$B%k!<%`$r$4MQ0UCW$7$^$7$?!#(B http://www.chabby-funk.com?two $B;XL><T!!NC;R!!(B 29$B:P!!(BF$B%+%C%W!!(BID$B!Z(B112070$B![$G$9!#H`=w$+$i!X!X!!FMA3$N%a!<%k$G?=$7Lu$"$j$^$;$s!#4JC1$K$G$9$,<+8J>R2p$r$5$;$FD:$-$^$9!#H~MF<<7P1D$r$7$F$$$^$9!#(B5$BG/4VDx7k:'$7$F$$$?$s$G$9$,!";E;v$NET9g$G$9$l0c$$$N@83h$,B3$-N%:'$7$F$7$^$$$^$7$?!#(B29$B:P$N;d$,Aj8_$NM}2r$,$"$kBg?M$N8r:]$r5a$a$F$$$^$9!#(B $B$*6b$O;d$NM_$rK~$?$7$FD:$/0Y$N<UNi$H9M$($F$$$?$@$1$l$P7k9=(B $B$G$9!#IT:Y9)$J=w$G$O$J$$$N$G(B($BH~MF<<7P1D(B)$B!"IT0B$@$C$?$i<L??(B $B8x3+$7$F$$$^$9$N$G!#;d$N?4$H?HBN$N7d4V$rKd$a$F$b$i$($^$9$G$7$g$&$+!)Fq$7$$;v$O8@$$$^$;$s!*JV;v$r$$$?$@$1$?$iD>@\%a!<%k$7$^$9!#4JC1$G$$$$$N$G!"5.J}MM$N<+8J>R2p$rE:$($F$*JV;v$$$?$@$1$^$;$s$G$7$g$&$+!)(B $B!Y$H$$$&%a%C%;!<%8$,:F$SF~$j$^$7$?!#(B $B;XL>$r<u$1$?5.J}$N@lMQ%k!<%`%J%s%P!<!Z(B#301$B![$G$9(B!$B@lMQ%-!<(B http://www.chabby-funk.com?two $BCm!'%K%C%/%M!<%`$N:G8e$K!Z(B#301$B![$r$DIU$1$F$$$?$@$1$l$P!"$9$0O"Mm<h$l$k$h!#H`=w==J,$JA06b$rJ'$C$?$?$aFs?M$G<YKb$5$l$:$f$C$/$j$G$-$^$9$h!#NC;R$5$s$O$H$C$/$KBT$C$F$$$k$+$i!"$I$&(B $B$>!"8f=P$G$/$@$5$$!#Ev%5%$%H$N$4MxMQ$O$9$Y$F%<%m1_!*!*(B $B5qH](Bnomore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Bug#339293: New version of spandsp available

On Thursday 12 January 2006 18:09, Kilian Krause wrote: > then I guess that's due to some API change. In that case libspandsp0 > should be updated to libspandsp1 or libspandsp-0.0.2, whatever the > upstream version has for SONAME. Hmm, seems so. I'll upload everything fixed tomorrow morning, now I have to run to get back home hehe > Have you tried using the Debian patch for app-dtmf-to-text? > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-voip/asterisk-spandsp-plugins/trunk/debian/p >atches/dtmffix.dpatch?op=file&rev=0&sc=0 Yep, I have tested it but it does not fixed the problem yet: gcc -Wall -g -fPIC -D_GNU_SOURCE -shared -o app_dtmftotext.so app_dtmftotext.c -lspandsp -ltiff app_dtmftotext.c: In function `festival_exec': app_dtmftotext.c:339: warning: implicit declaration of function `ast_load' app_dtmftotext.c:339: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast app_dtmftotext.c:396: warning: implicit declaration of function `__gethostbyname__is__not__reentrant__use__ast_gethostbyname__instead__' app_dtmftotext.c:396: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast Jan 12 16:22:11 WARNING[27188] loader.c: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_dtmftotext.so: undefined symbol: ast_load Jan 12 16:22:11 WARNING[27188] loader.c: Loading module app_dtmftotext.so failed! Btw, this is the last bug (from 3) that I'm trying to fix until I can send to you guys my packages for Unicall, MFC/R2 and Supertone. Wee :) -- Caio Begotti (caio1982) http://caio.ueberalles.net

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Bug#339293: New version of spandsp available

On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:36, Caio Begotti wrote: > Folks, any new news about it so far? A new version of SpanDSP was made available 3 days ago but I didn't notice it. My webdir already has the new packages for spandsp_0.0.2pre23* and waiting for tests and perhaps a future upload... This version does fix some bugs left in pre22, add an alaw_ulaw test program and some code regarding the libtiff use to generate the FAX page. It's now okay for some people not getting good results with FAX images in 0.0.2pre22 (reported on IRC but I don't think it was Steve Underwood's fault anyway). By the way, do you guys think would be interesting to include the spandsp test programs into the package? Even as source files I mean. -- Caio Begotti (caio1982) http://caio.ueberalles.net
Sign up for updates to this mailing list. email:
Loading Comments...
Home | News | Patents | Sitemap | FAQ | advertise

Advertising by