|
Bug#319227: asterisk: ftbfs [sparc] static declaration of 'uniquelock' foll: msg#00186linux.debian.packages.voip.devel
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 08:31:53AM +1000, Mark Purcell wrote: > severity 318337 serious > merge 318337 319227 > tags 219227 help > thanks > We already have a report for this against the BTS, what I really need is a > patch to make it work. > Can you assist? Isn't the obvious solution to remove the 'static' keyword from line 64 of channel.c? That, or to remove the declaration of 'uniquelock' from the header if it's not actually supposed to be supported. Or to rename one of the two variables in the source, if these are actually two variables with the same name. > > channel.c:64: error: static declaration of 'uniquelock' follows non-static > > declaration > > include/asterisk/channel.h:58: error: previous declaration of 'uniquelock' > > was here > > make[1]: *** > > [channel.o] Error 1 -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Pkg-voip-maintainers mailing list Pkg-voip-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-voip-maintainers |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Processed: Solution: 00186, Debian Bug Tracking System |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Bug#318337: Solution: 00186, Dan Weber |
| Previous by Thread: | Bug#319227: asterisk: ftbfs [sparc] static declaration of 'uniquelock' follows non-static declarationi: 00186, Blars Blarson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bug#319227: asterisk: ftbfs [sparc] static declaration of 'uniquelock' follows non-static declaration: 00186, Mark Purcell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |