Re: vim-full

On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 10:33:36AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > The package is no longer required when we kicked out diversions and
> > moved to alternatives.
> This is untrue. Alternatives leverage the conflictuality of vim flavors

Playing with vim-full a bit more I realized that only one GUI could be
compiled in. Sorry, this was not clear to me: I assumed that there was
possible to pass command line options to decide which GUI to run.

Thus, what I'm proposing for sarge is:
- vim-full  variant with support for gnome GUI and all interpreters

I built the package, a comparison of sizes (on amd64) follows:

              .deb size   installed size    RSS
vim-python      804872        1724          6708
vim-full        835316        1792          9660

For post-sarge I think that something similar could be still
interesting. Indeed is possible that people want support for all
interpreters on all possible GUIs, but gnome is likely to be the most
widespread one.

I can commit may changes if accepted.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature