Re: vim-full

On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 02:26:04AM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > I like the idea.
> I don't, but maybe it's the best for sarge.

Just to better understand your position: why you don't like it?

> The package is no longer required when we kicked out diversions and
> moved to alternatives.

This is untrue. Alternatives leverage the conflictuality of vim flavors
but do not solve the problem of users needing compile time features only
available in different executables like the submitter #149077 (who want
both perl and python support at the same time) and the guy asking me gtk
+ gnome + python.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature