|
Re: (forw) The debian-l10n-arabic have been created: msg#00071linux.debian.internationalization.general
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 06:11:13PM +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote: > I think that a RTL list will serve us better than just an arabic list, > since the problems are very much alike. > > > The same applies to debian-l10n-arabic which has been created about > > one week ago. > > Isn't the difficulties that are imposed by RTL a subset of those imposed by Arabic? With a dedicated Arabic effort we might end up with duplicate solutions, with irritating differences. Not to mention the duplication of the effort. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: (forw) The debian-l10n-korean and debian-l10n-arabic have been created: 00071, Christian Perrier |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: (forw) The debian-l10n-korean and debian-l10n-arabic have been created: 00071, Denis Barbier |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: (forw) The debian-l10n-korean and debian-l10n-arabic have been createdi: 00071, Christian Perrier |
| Next by Thread: | Re: (forw) The debian-l10n-korean and debian-l10n-arabic have been created: 00071, Denis Barbier |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |