Re: LANGUAGE vs LANG

On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 11:50:27AM +0100, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> [ are you on debian-i18n, or would you like to be Cc'ed? ]

I'm subscribed, no problem.

> Summary:
> 
> It would probably be a good idea to send a bug report 
> up-stream to the GNU Gettext maintainers, where you
> suggest that they:
> 
>  1) make sure that the language set with "LANG" always is
>     prioritised over the ones set with "LANGUAGE"

No need to send the bugreport, since everything seems clearer now
(see reply from Denis Barbier).

>  2) make sure to stick to the encoding set with "LANG", even
>     when they fall back to a different language in the user
>     interface translations

This is the current behavior. Encoding is taken from LANG, program
interface speaks in whatever language is set in LANGUAGE (if not set,
fallback to LC_ALL, LC_MESSAGES, LANG), so you just have to take care
of setting the "broadest possible encoding" in your LANG variable (or
LC_* for that matter), which seems to be UTF-8 these days.

The only problem remains that many applications are not UTF-8 ready
(aptitude comes to mind, nvi, ...)

On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 02:08:18PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 10:42:35AM +0100, Miroslav Kure wrote:
> >
> > man locale doesn't talk about this variable either.
> 
> It is documented in libc info pages.


Thanks both of you!
-- 
Miroslav Kure