On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:14:19 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> >>> Just do it :-)
> >> Partly done. See versioncheck.pl and Common.pl.
> http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/qa/versions-wip.html
Looks great, thanks!
> OK, it is now almost complete. The resulting list has no items that
> should not be there.
Comparing with the "old" version looks really good.
> It caches most of the information, so invoking it
> twice in a row is really fast (<10s in warn caches). Mimics uscan's
> functionality for CPAN modules, including version mangling, sf.net
> workaround etc.
Wow!
*trying at home*
1st run: 8m5.450s
2nd run: 7m51.874s
Hm, I must be doing something wrong (yes the cache is created) :-)
> I am thinking about
> (1) using this instead of versioncheck-html
cronjob adjusted.
versions-wip.html moved to versions.html.
> (2) making it run more often. I am not certain how often and have some
> doubts about cache expiration times, which are more-or-less
> arbitrary now. please suggest
I'm not sure about what we can do without harming alioth.
Raphaël?
> (3) rewriting maintainercheck and wnppcheck too
> maintainercheck now runs for 14s, which is simply ages :)
*hehe*
Yup, might be nicer with libparse-debianchangelog-perl
> wnpp can't be made quicker, I guess, since it depends on
> bugs.debian.org/wnpp, which is not that fast. Perhaps try
> www.debian.org/devel/wnpp ? Or the SOAP interface?
I have no experience with the SOAP interface but grepping through the
downloaded webpage is not very elegant ...
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
: :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/
`- NP: Rod Stewart: If We Fall In Love Tonight
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
| 
