Hello
Matthias Klose recently wrote about an issue with "long *double" changes
in GCC that maybe makes it necessary to rename some Perl packages.
He proposed that my below quoted questions should be discussed among the
Perl core maintainers:
> > On 2007-06-23 Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Package: libdbi-perl
> > ...
> > > This package has been indentified as one with header files in
> > > /usr/include matching 'long *double'. Please close this bug report
> > > if it is a false positive, or rename the package accordingly.
> >
> > The libdbi-perl package has no files in /usr/include. The long double
> > is only in a header file that is hidden deep in /usr/lib/perl5.
> >
> > Does it make sense to link against /usr/lib/perl5/auto/DBI/DBI.so?
> >
> > Do I really have to rename the pacakge? And if so to libdbi-perl-ldbl or
> > to libdbi-perlldbl?
What do you think?
bye,
-christian-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
| 
