Re: unversioned shared library

Eric Van Buggenhaut <Eric.VanBuggenhaut@xxxxxxxxxxx> immo vero scripsit:

> I never made a separate packages for the lib part (no -dev either)
> cause the package is really small but now some other DD asks me for an
> extra package, containing the lib (+ another -dev package) because his
> own package depends on the same library.
> 
> Upstream author never versioned his dynamic library. What am I
> supposed to do ? What soname should I use for the library ?


See libpkg-guide for some help.


adding something to:

libwhatever_la_LDFLAGS = -export-dynamic -release @VERSION@ -version-info 0:0:0
to Makefile.am should create something reasonable for an unstable shared 
library, suggest using this for the upstream (if they do versioning at all).


But I suggest reading libtool/autoconf/automake manual a bit.


regards,
        junichi

-- 
dancer@xxxxxxxxxx : Junichi Uekawa   http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423  7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx