logo       

Re: iptables-devel in centos 4.4: msg#00109

linux.centos.devel

Subject: Re: iptables-devel in centos 4.4

On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 05:02:11PM -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> >* Tue May 23 2006 Jakub Jelinek
> ><jakub-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 3.4.6-3
> >- -fvar-tracking fixes needed for SystemTap (BZ#2438)
> - not clear which BZ is referred to, but it is not the
> Red Hat one; not in the Cygwin one
> (http://www.cygwin.com/bugzilla/), not in the Gnu one
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/)

Red Hat's secret other bugzilla. <http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla> -->
<http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2438>.

> >- add workaround for buggy programs that link in their own unwinder
> > and reexport it (#192814)
> - probably the Red Hat bugzilla, but bug 192814 is
> blocked from review by 'mere mortals' in the general public --
> This implies a security related matter, which are
> definitionally important changes

Sadly, it seems to often imply "involves big-name customer, or customer who
thinks they are big name". But yeah, not being able to review the bug is a
bad thing.


[...]

> and as we see in this case, and after inspection from the
> Changelog, and the outlinks it references, that NONE of the
> underlying reasoning nor cause for the changes for that GCC
> variant may be inspected, without further study than what we
> have or can easily access.

That does seem to be true in this case.



--
Matthew Miller mattdm-u0/72CSfwU0dnm+yROfE0A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise