|
Re: Installonlyn plugin for yum: msg#00099linux.centos.devel
Milan Keršláger wrote: >>>> I guess that we could split it out and make it a standalone package. >>> Or better follow Fedora Core and put it into the yum package. >> we could pull it into the main package, but it would need to stay >> disabled - its too major a change in functionality to throw at people >> midway during the release. > > It is not needed. Updates brings change in functionality every time are > released (even from upstream). > > This is security enhancement also. Imagine that system boot with older > kernel by mistake - this open the door for script kiddies (or hackers). you have a valid point in that its a new point release, and its ok to add functionality this way, BUT the issue is that there are admins out there who would rely on having a stable distro - where functionality to automatically start removing stuff does not get introduced midway. And that is where my issue is - I dont want to introduce something middway that will start removing packages automatically. > > So put it in and don't ask. Only write about it in the release info. > we can mention the availability of this plugin in the release notes, would you like to do a small writeup of maybe 1 paragraph on this ? we can then include that into the release notes perhaps ? If the other centos developers agree, I see no harm in adding some info about the existance of this plugin and what it would achieve. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: ipp2p package: 00099, Karanbir Singh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: iptables-devel in centos 4.4: 00099, Karanbir Singh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Installonlyn plugin for yumi: 00099, Milan Keršláger |
| Next by Thread: | Installonlyn plugin for yum: 00099, R P Herrold |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |