|
Re: Some problems with busybox-1.0.0-pre1: msg#00217linux.busybox
Manuel, > > > Hmm... I suppose that if you were using uClibc and if /dev/null didn't > > > exist, then a /dev/null empty regular file could be created by > > > asprintf(). Is /dev/null a regular file? > > > > > I'm indeed using uClibc (0.9.20). /dev/null is created with "mknod > > null c 1 3" and "chmod 666 null". I wasn't complete in my previous > > Let's try again. You said that it looked like /dev/null was generated > automaticly by busybox. I said that if /dev/null didn't exist, then > it could be created by a uClibc call to asprintf (assuming perms). > > In order to see if this was the case, I asked if the automaticly > generated /dev/null was a regular file. Is it? > I'm sorry, yes it is: brw-rw---- 1 root root 93, 4 Jul 28 17:42 nftla4 -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 0 Jul 28 17:42 null crw-rw---- 1 root root 10, 144 Jul 28 17:42 nvram > If so, then the fix is for me to finally redo uClibc's fopencookie() > function so that it does not open /dev/null. > > Manuel > Eric |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Some problems with busybox-1.0.0-pre1: 00217, Vladimir N. Oleynik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Some problems with busybox-1.0.0-pre1: 00217, Manuel Novoa III |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Some problems with busybox-1.0.0-pre1i: 00217, Manuel Novoa III |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Some problems with busybox-1.0.0-pre1: 00217, Manuel Novoa III |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |