|
Re: DOLFS vs CONFIG_LFS: msg#00168linux.busybox
On Fri Jul 25, 2003 at 05:34:58PM -0700, Jared Rhine wrote: > Is there some breakage between DOLFS and CONFIG_LFS? I finally wanted > to use fdisk but found it wasn't compiled in, because CONFIG_FDISK > depends on CONFIG_LFS, which doesn't exist anywhere except in that > Config.in? > > Does anyone, anywhere have fdisk working in 1.00-pre1? DOLFS no longer exists. It was replaced by CONFIG_LFS. Try doing a 'make oldconfig'. I have also recently removed the fdisk dependancy on CONFIG_LFS, since fdisk will work just fine (albeit on smaller disks) w/o it. -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Is there anybody who succeeded mounting NFS with busybox?: 00168, Jared Rhine |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | DOLFS vs CONFIG_LFS: 00168, Jared Rhine |
| Previous by Thread: | DOLFS vs CONFIG_LFSi: 00168, Jared Rhine |
| Next by Thread: | DOLFS vs CONFIG_LFS: 00168, Jared Rhine |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |