logo       

RE: Rfcomm Use Count: msg#00104

linux.bluez.devel

Subject: RE: Rfcomm Use Count

Hi Marcel,

> I understand what you mean and it should be impossible to
> have an socket
> on the accept_q with state BT_CLOSED. May you wanna remove the extra
> code in ...accept_dequeue() and only leave a warning message
> there when
> you do your tests. However this extra code should not harm and I don't
> see an easy solution for getting the module reference
> decrementing right
> when we have to do it in ...accept_dequeue() for all socket types.

I think I'll leave the code as is, unless you're considering removing the
code in accept_dequeue(). If there's a problem, we'll see the use count go
up.

Thanks for working on this... Looks like you spent some late nights on it.

-Daryl.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise