|
RE: Rfcomm Use Count: msg#00104linux.bluez.devel
Hi Marcel, > I understand what you mean and it should be impossible to > have an socket > on the accept_q with state BT_CLOSED. May you wanna remove the extra > code in ...accept_dequeue() and only leave a warning message > there when > you do your tests. However this extra code should not harm and I don't > see an easy solution for getting the module reference > decrementing right > when we have to do it in ...accept_dequeue() for all socket types. I think I'll leave the code as is, unless you're considering removing the code in accept_dequeue(). If there's a problem, we'll see the use count go up. Thanks for working on this... Looks like you spent some late nights on it. -Daryl. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Rfcomm Use Count: 00104, Marcel Holtmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Rfcomm Use Count: 00104, Daryl Van Vorst |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Rfcomm Use Counti: 00104, Marcel Holtmann |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Rfcomm Use Count: 00104, Marcel Holtmann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |