|
RE: Rfcomm Use Count: msg#00081linux.bluez.devel
Hi Daryl, > At the moment I think calling ...sock_close() and ...sock_kill() in that > function is wrong. However I am not 100% sure. maybe this one helps: --- 1.29/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c 2004-06-04 02:41:47 +02:00 +++ edited/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c 2004-09-22 00:12:34 +02:00 @@ -104,8 +104,13 @@ if (d->state == BT_CONNECTED) rfcomm_session_getaddr(d->session, &bt_sk(sk)->src, NULL); sk->sk_state_change(sk); - } else + } else { + if (d->state == BT_CLOSED) { + bt_accept_unlink(sk); + sk->sk_zapped = 1; + } parent->sk_data_ready(parent, 0); + } bh_unlock_sock(sk); } Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Rfcomm Use Count: 00081, Marcel Holtmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Rfcomm Use Count: 00081, Daryl Van Vorst |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Rfcomm Use Counti: 00081, Marcel Holtmann |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Rfcomm Use Count: 00081, Daryl Van Vorst |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |