|
configure.in question: msg#00056linux.bluez.devel
Hi, im one of the multisync devs. as you probably know, we are using your bluetooth libraries in our application. Up until now we used this in a configure.in to detect the bluetooth libraries: AC_CHECK_LIB(bluetooth,baswap,BLUETOOTH=1,BLUETOOTH=0) SDP=0 AC_CHECK_LIB(sdp,sdp_list_free,SDP=1,BLUETOOTH=0) AC_MSG_CHECKING(for correct SDP lib version) AC_TRY_COMPILE([ #include <bluetooth/sdp.h> #include <bluetooth/sdp_lib.h> ],[sdp_record_t t;],AC_MSG_RESULT(yes),BLUETOOTH=0;AC_MSG_RESULT(no)) AM_CONDITIONAL(BLUETOOTH,test "${BLUETOOTH}" = "1") if test "x${BLUETOOTH}" = "x0"; then echo "Bluetooth is DISABLED. You must have bluez-libs and bluez-kernel >= 2.3 and bluez-sdp >= 1.0-pre1." fi AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(HAVE_BLUETOOTH, ${BLUETOOTH},Defined if Bluetooth is enabled.) and src/Makefile.am libirmc_bluetooth_la_LIBADD = -lbluetooth -lsdp -lpthread some time ago, the sdp library merged into the libbluetooth. Therefore this check will not detect this correctly anymore. So i was wondering what would be the correct approach to detect if the -lsdp is needed? Which version was the first version of libbluetooth that got rid of the libsdp? Armin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Rfcomm Use Count: 00056, Marcel Holtmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: configure.in question: 00056, Marcel Holtmann |
| Previous by Thread: | Switching class II to class III?i: 00056, Stefan Mischke |
| Next by Thread: | Re: configure.in question: 00056, Marcel Holtmann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |