logo       

Re: L2CAP: One failing connection hurts others?: msg#00046

linux.bluez.devel

Subject: Re: L2CAP: One failing connection hurts others?

Hello Marcel!

I just tested this rather old dongle:

hci0: Type: USB
BD Address: 00:06:AB:80:6F:5C ACL MTU: 377:10 SCO MTU: 16:0
UP RUNNING PSCAN ISCAN
RX bytes:64709 acl:1565 sco:0 events:1055 errors:0
TX bytes:38780 acl:1236 sco:0 commands:297 errors:0
Features: 0xff 0xfd 0x05 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
Packet type: DM1 DM3 DM5 DH1 DH3 DH5 HV1 HV2 HV3
Link policy: RSWITCH HOLD SNIFF PARK
Link mode: SLAVE ACCEPT
Name: 'BlueZ (0)'
Class: 0x000100
Service Classes: Unspecified
Device Class: Computer, Uncategorized
HCI Ver: 1.1 (0x1) HCI Rev: 0x2 LMP Ver: 1.1 (0x1) LMP Subver: 0x1007
Manufacturer: Broadcom Corporation (15)

Same problem. I tried the same dongle one year ago and it was not supported by BlueZ. Now it is. Thumbs up for that!

Marcel Holtmann schrieb:

There are more than one timeouts in the BlueZ stack. Even the ACL
disconnect timeout is different for the initiator and the acceptor of
and ACL connection. Keep an eye on the HCI disconnect events on each of
your devices and compare the timestamps.

I set my timeouts by setting SO_RCVTIMEO and SO_SNDTIMEO on the L2CAP socket. But I think this is just the socket timeout. Is there a way to influence the internal timeouts of BlueZ (L2CAP, ACL)?

Regards
Stefan



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: thawte's Crypto Challenge Vl
Crack the code and win a Sony DCRHC40 MiniDV Digital Handycam
Camcorder. More prizes in the weekly Lunch Hour Challenge.
Sign up NOW http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;10740251;10262165;m


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise