|
Re: L2CAP: One failing connection hurts others?: msg#00039linux.bluez.devel
Hi Stefan, > > your firmware is HCI 16.4 which is good, but you are going to create a > > scatternet on your client and that can be the problem. Looks like this > > is an internal problem of the CSR firmware. > You mean the dongles try to create a scatternet (with packet routing > and so on) on their own? I always thought a scatternet has to be > implemented outside the hard-/firmware. no, you only create a scatternet. This means when one device must be member of two different piconets. > Is there a way to upgrade it? Are there better dongles the University > could buy? You can upgrade the D-Link DBT-120 Rev. B3 with the Apple firmware update package to HCI 18.1. > > Try to introduce some delays > > between the connections and see if that helps. > > > I'm experimenting with delays and timeouts for three days now. It > helps... a bit, but not really good. I just tried to switch > master-slave, but it doesn't really help. I think you should avoid the role-switching and keep the listening applications as slaves. In this case the client creates the piconet and can keep both servers in the same piconet. > One year ago, I wrote another Location Awareness App on top of a > modified JBlueZ and it just used ACL links to measure RSSI and LQ. It > worked. I probably have to take care of the ACLs myself (does L2CAP > use existing ACLs?). The only drawback: The App has to run as root :(. The L2CAP creates the same ACL links, so this can't be the problem. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: thawte's Crypto Challenge Vl Crack the code and win a Sony DCRHC40 MiniDV Digital Handycam Camcorder. More prizes in the weekly Lunch Hour Challenge. Sign up NOW http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;10740251;10262165;m |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: L2CAP: One failing connection hurts others?: 00039, Stefan Mischke |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Rfcomm use count: 00039, Daryl Van Vorst |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: L2CAP: One failing connection hurts others?i: 00039, Stefan Mischke |
| Next by Thread: | Re: L2CAP: One failing connection hurts others?: 00039, Stefan Mischke |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |