|
pand vs. rfcomm: msg#00015linux.bluez.devel
Hello, I have rfcomm working among a few small embedded devices for transferring small amounts of data - less than 100 bytes of data per second. I have a master and four slaves in a small piconet. Now I'm adding a higher bandwidth connection between my master and another device with pand. The master is an embedded xScale single board computer Linux 2.4.26 with the latest patches. The other device here is an iPAQ 5550 with built in bluetooth - running Familiar Linux. A single bnep connection is established OK and seems to work pretty well. If I establish a bnep connection, I can do all the usual TCP/IP stuff between the two - ping, telnet, ftp work just fine. But I'm wondering if the bnep connection interferes with the rfcomm's that are used in the piconet. Can I have multiple asynchronous processes using bnep and rfcomm without interfering with each other ? Here's what happens:
- Then I start the pand and this establishes the bnep connection OK. I can ping, ftp, etc. - After a few minutes, the bnep connection fails to transmit any more data. Is this to be expected ? thanks, and best regards, Rich Williams Richard B. Williams
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Tutorial programming with bluez?: 00015, Marcel Holtmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | sdp_search and l2cap concurrently: 00015, Stefan Mischke |
| Previous by Thread: | Tutorial programming with bluez?i: 00015, R . Schade |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pand vs. rfcomm: 00015, Marcel Holtmann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |