logo       

a dmraid bug on Promise RAID (urgent!): msg#00005

linux.ataraid

Subject: a dmraid bug on Promise RAID (urgent!)

Hi Heinz,

       Could you please review the following issue?

       Looking forward to your reply!

 

Thanks!

conke

 


From: Conke Hu
Sent: 2006
929 20:38
To: 'Mauelshagen@xxxxxxxxxx'
Cc: 'g.hoogewerf@xxxxxxxxx'
Subject: a dmraid bug on Promise RAID

 

Hi,

       There is bug in pdc.c (lib/format/ataraid/pdc.c). when you activate the promise software RAID, you will get the error messages shown in the attached screenshot.

       We’ve found the root cause. Firstly let’s take a look at struct pdc:

       struct pdc {

       uint8_t promise_id[PDC_ID_LENGTH];   /* 0x00 - 0x17 */

       uint32_t unknown_0;                /* 0x18 - 0x1B */

       uint32_t magic_0;                     /* 0x1C - 0x1F */

       According to the Promise engineer, the value set at offset 0x1C is not a magic number, but records the RAID engine version. So when dmraid executes the following code (lib/format/ataraid/pdc.c):

    if (pdc->magic_0 == pdc->raid.magic_0 &&

            pdc->raid.total_disks &&

            pdc->raid.total_disks < PDC_MAXDISKS)

                return 1;

       it always returns 1 since pdc->magic_0 never equals pdc->raid.magic_0 !

       To fix this bug, dmraid source code only needs to ignore checking magic_0, modified to the following:

       if ( pdc->raid.total_disks &&

            pdc->raid.total_disks < PDC_MAXDISKS)

                return 1;

       I have tested this modification and it is safe to delete “pdc->magic_0 == pdc->raid.magic_0”.

       Could you please do this change in next dmraid version?

 

Thanks!

Conke

 

_______________________________________________
Ataraid-list mailing list
Ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise