logo       

Is this possibly a bug?: msg#00904

lilypond-devel-gnu

Subject: Is this possibly a bug?


I read in the docs regarding accidental styles:

`forget'
This is the opposite of `no-reset': Accidentals are not remembered
at all - and hence all accidentals are typeset relative to the key
signature, regardless of what came before in the music. Unlike
`dodecaphonic', this rule never prints any naturals.

[image src="lilypond/92/lily-93d90ee7.png" alt="[image of music]"
text="[image of music]"]


But if the key signature is, say, G major, then a note f would be
printed with a natural accidental. So "this rule never prints any
naturals" would appear wrong to me.

--
David Kastrup



_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | Mail Home | sitemap | FAQ | advertise