Re: Convert-ly rules for C++/Scheme predicates?

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys<hanwenn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Patrick McCarty<pnorcks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I having trouble deciding what to do with this patch I posted a few
>> months ago:
>>
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-12/msg00715.html
>>
>> Just to clarify, the renames are:
>>
>> Âdispatcher --> ly:dispatcher?
>> Âlistener --> ly:listener?
>>
>> There are no other C++ predicate callbacks that have this problem.
>>
>> ________________________________________
>>
>> Should I make convert-ly rules for them?
>
> No; if someone complains, figure what to do afterwards.

Okay, thanks.  I pushed the patch.

-Patrick


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel