|
Re: e2fsck problem: (Bad address) while doing inode scan: msg#00202lib.uclibc.general
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 10:55:04 -0700, Erik Andersen <andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I verified the problem persists with e2fsprogs 1.27. > >How big is the partition you are running fsck.ext2 on? I posted fdisk and tune2fs data at end of 1st email, about 3.3/3.5GB Am I right that LFS should not matter in this case? uclibc is compiled without it as you can see from 1st email. >How you tried getting an strace of the problem? copied by hand (strace e2fsck /dev/hda3) ... ... lseek(5, 2139351040, SEEK_SET) = 2139351040 read(5, "\0\0\0\0\0 <cut >.... \0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0" ... 8192 = 8192 lseek(5, 2139359232, SEEK_SET) = 2139359232 read(5, "\0\0\0\0\0 <cut >.... \0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0" ... 8192 = 8192 lseek(5, 2139367424, SEEK_SET) = 2139367424 read(5, "\0\0\0\0\0 <cut >.... \0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0" ... 8192 = 8192 __lseek(5, 0, 0x80004800, SEEK_SET) = -1 EFAULT (Bad Address) __lseek(5, 0, 0x80004800, SEEK_SET) = -1 EFAULT (Bad Address) write(1 .. error reading block write(1, "2097170", 72097170)... ... Right now I don't have a real system (as opposed to vmware) to test it. If necessary will do it next days. Thanks -- giulioo@xxxxxxxxx |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: e2fsck problem: (Bad address) while doing inode scan: 00202, Erik Andersen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Microblaze uClibc: 00202, John Williams |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: e2fsck problem: (Bad address) while doing inode scani: 00202, Erik Andersen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: e2fsck problem: (Bad address) while doing inode scan: 00202, Giulio Orsero |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |