|
Re: compiling lshw with uClibc: msg#00174lib.uclibc.general
Roland; When comparing the "size" of a binary, such as "ls", add up the things it needs to run. uClibc gains from being a small SHARED LIBRARY. 1) ls -al your ls command > rabbit:~ # ls -al /bin/ls > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 68524 Oct 16 09:01 /bin/ls 2) ldd your ls command, see the libraries it needs > rabbit:~ # ldd /bin/ls > librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0x40024000) > libacl.so.1 => /lib/libacl.so.1 (0x40035000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4003c000) > libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x4015c000) > libattr.so.1 => /lib/libattr.so.1 (0x40171000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000) 3) add up all those sizes -- all of them are needed to use "ls" > ls -al /bin/ls /lib/libc.so.6 /lib/librt.so.1 /lib/libacl.so.1.0.3 > /lib/libpthread.so.0 /lib/libattr.so.1.0.1 /lib/ld-2.2.5.so | \ > awk '{print $5" "$9; sum += $5} END {print sum}' > 68524 /bin/ls > 86441 /lib/ld-2.2.5.so > 25238 /lib/libacl.so.1.0.3 > 9429 /lib/libattr.so.1.0.1 > 1321674 /lib/libc.so.6 > 106013 /lib/libpthread.so.0 > 33743 /lib/librt.so.1 > 1651062 So we show that it takes 1.6 MB to run "ls"; that can't even fit on a floppy. repeat on a uClibc version Allan Roland Nagtegaal wrote: > > Hello, > > as I'm new to uClibc, let me introduce myself: > I am Roland Nagtegaal, and I work as a system admin at the university of > Leiden, Netherlands (physics department). > > I was working on a mini-linux distro, to fit on a floppy. > > It must contain the kernel, busybox, scp, and lshw, and possibly enough > of the uClibc libraries to make them run. > > My problem is that I can't compile lshw under uClibc. For that, I need > to compile libstd++ first. > > 1. So, my first question is: is there a simple way to compile libstd++ ? > I searched the mailinglist, but that did not help me much... > > 2. How do I compile the linux kernel with uClibc ? I ran make bzImage, > but the executable was only 16KB. Too small, even with uClibc > (and it didn't run of course). make zImage also fails, and make > vmlinux works, but gives a 2.5MB file. > > 3. uClibc compiled binaries are not always smaller, it seems. For > instance: /bin/ls in the buildroot environment is 76KB, but on > redhat 7.3 it is 46KB (I did check it is not actaully a link to > busybox, it isn't). That is not a question, but what is the > norm? How much smaller are uClibc binaries usually? > > Thank you, > > Roland Nagtegaal > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Name: signature.asc > signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature > Description: This is a digitally signed message part
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | compiling lshw with uClibc: 00174, Roland Nagtegaal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: compiling lshw with uClibc: 00174, Erik Andersen |
| Previous by Thread: | compiling lshw with uClibci: 00174, Roland Nagtegaal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: compiling lshw with uClibc: 00174, Erik Andersen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |