|
Re: Re: buildroot with glibc?: msg#00143lib.uclibc.general
On Sat Mar 15, 2003 at 10:52:50AM -0800, David Wuertele wrote: > Me> I really like this buildroot system. Thanks again! I was > Me> thinking it would be nice to be able to quickly switch between > Me> uclibc and glibc systems that were built the same way. Has anyone > Me> made a makefile to drop into buildroot for building with glibc? > > Steven> BLASPHEMER!!!! :) > > But gosh, wouldn't you like to show your boss two nand images, one > that is huge and one that is tiny, and say "see how much money I'm > saving you on embedded nand flash capacity by choosing this more risky > libc?" Feel free to implement it. It really isn't very hard. > If I could just save 30% on NAND usage, I would be a hero. > Unfortunately, that is hard to justify right now because a critical > module won't even insmod. Because as we have mentioned several times, it appears your huge C++ module is dynamically linked againt libgcc, -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: buildroot with glibc?: 00143, David Wuertele |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: uClibc and Sash issues: 00143, Erik Andersen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: buildroot with glibc?i: 00143, David Wuertele |
| Next by Thread: | uClibc and Sash issues: 00143, Andrew Hall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |