Re: gcc-uClibc botches -nodefaultlibs / -nostdlib

On Wed Oct 23, 2002 at 01:22:49PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Miles Bader <miles@xxxxxxx> writes:
> > I don't know the semantics that gcc uses for these options (I can look
> > tomorrow if you want), but based on the code in gcc-uClibc, it looks like 
> > the
> > intention is that you use `-nostdlib' in the case where you want _nothing_
> > passed to the linker, and `-nodefaultlibs' when you just want to omit the
> > system _libraries_.
> 
> I looked at the gcc docs, and they seem to agree with what I wrote
> above.  So can I check my change?

Yes, go ahead.

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--