|
Re: intrinsic / extrinsic camera calibration: msg#01168lib.opencv
Well, I'm still at it. Today I didn't pay as much attention to the morning talks as I should have and did a comparison between 0.9.7 beta 5 (cvCalibrateCamera2) and 0.9.7 beta 4 (cvCalibrateCamera) and the associated functions. I did this on my own data, and on Zhang's data (from http://research.microsoft.com/~zhang/calib/) for verification. And my results are that both beta 5 and beta 4 computed values extremely close (~1%) to Zhang's results. However, for my set of input images, they returned very different sets of values, which I guess means that it really is much more sensitive than I expected to the quality of the input datasets. One thing definitely worth mentioning is that Zhang's dataset uses only 5 images, and any subset of 4 of them will produce good, close values, so it would seem the acquisition of 20 or so images is unecessary. A better approach that I think I'll take is to acquire 5 images, and then compare the calibration results of all 5 vs. each subset of 4, and see how big the differences are. If the results vary too much, I won't accept the results and instead require acquisition of better inupt images. If anyone's interested in the specifics of how I did my comparisons, I'm happy to talk about them in more detail. -stephen diverdi -sdiverdi@xxxxxxxxxxx > > No replies to this? I've noticed that this question has been asked a > few times in recent months, without much discussion. At this point I'm > more interested in hearing if anyone has successfully used > cvCalibrateCamera2 for their camera calibration needs, more than > examining my particular case. Are there people out there currently > using the new cvCalibrateCamera2 routine with satisfaction? > > My next step is to try doing a comparison between the results from the > older cvCalibrateCamera and cvCalibrateCamera2, both with my data and > with Zhang's example data for comparison with his results. This may take > me a little while, but I'll post my results when I get them. > > Can anyone say anything more about the algorithm used in > cvCalibrateCamera? cvCalibrateCamera2 is clearly marked as being a port > of the Matlab call based on Zhang's work, but no such attribution exists > in the older source. > > Thanks, > > -stephen diverdi > -sdiverdi@xxxxxxxxxxx > Change settings: http://www.yahoogroups.com/mygroups, select Get Emails (get all posts) Daily Digest (one summary email per day) Read on the web (read posts on the web only)Or Unsubscribe by mailing OpenCV-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | How to read the data in a ".txt" document and store the data in a matrix?: 01168, 阳 赵 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | newbie running under windows xp, cxcore097.dll not found error: 01168, tshenry2001 |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Re: intrinsic / extrinsic camera calibrationi: 01168, Philip Gruebele |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Re: intrinsic / extrinsic camera calibration: 01168, Philip Gruebele |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |