Re: Revisit Cygwin/OpenAL/OpenAL32 and SimgearCompile[OpenAL Patch]

Sven Panne wrote:
> > Sven Panne wrote: 
> > > * The config file handling is still a mess (errors are not handled, 
> > 
> > Not sure I would even know where to begin - I was just happy 
> > I sort of understood and got it to where I could tell what it 
> > was doing. 
>  
> My reply wasn't meant to critize your patches at all, it was just a 
> statement regarding the overall config file handling. 

Oh I know - I always look at those like 'ahhhh cool another project' but I 
fumbled around just getting where I did so I might have to let this go to you 
real gurus.

> > > * The MMSYSTEM backend has not been tested, but at least it 
> > compiles 
> > > on Cygwin. The backend has been heavily restructured and 
> > reformatted 
> > > to 
> > 
> > Show my denseness - is this the same as the windows backend I 
> > submitted the patches for and you are just wanting someone to 
> > double chekc - good idea :-). [...] 
>  
> Hmmm, I am not sure if I understand your reply... :-/ What I did was: I 
> merged your MMSYSTEM backend patch, renamed/reordered a few things to 
> make this backend look more similar to the other ones, and finally used 
> GNU indent.

I didn't word it well - I was simply inquiry if your reference to MMSYSTEM was 
still refering to the alc_backend_windows.c program or if the was another 
backend that also needed review/work for the windows environment - I'm just not 
always clear on terminology - especially in multi environment apps.

later 

bk