Re: solaris gcc 3.2 stlport regexp (bug?): msg#00290 lib.boost.user

Hi John + All,

The bug seems to lye with stlport. Removing it (fully, I can't have
done that when I tried to) removes the problems. Something in stlport
is responsible.

Thanks for your patience, I'll try to figure out what is wrong with
stlport.

Chris

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/CBxunD/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/EbFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Info: <http://www.boost.org>
Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:	Link problem with boost::signals and console applications in MS Visual C++ 6 / Windows: 00290, Klaus Nowikow
Next by Date:	Re: Is intrusive_ptr the thing to use?: 00290, Peter Dimov
Previous by Thread:	Re: solaris gcc 3.2 stlport regexp (bug?)i: 00290, c_twiner
Next by Thread:	Re: Re: solaris gcc 3.2 stlport regexp (bug?): 00290, John Maddock
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Previous by Date:

Link problem with boost::signals and console applications in MS Visual C++ 6 / Windows: 00290, Klaus Nowikow

Next by Date:

Re: Is intrusive_ptr the thing to use?: 00290, Peter Dimov

Previous by Thread:

Re: solaris gcc 3.2 stlport regexp (bug?)i: 00290, c_twiner

Next by Thread:

Re: Re: solaris gcc 3.2 stlport regexp (bug?): 00290, John Maddock

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]