|
Re: What is wrong with the GLPL?: msg#00270lib.boost.user
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:01:59AM -0500, scleary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > There is a second problem with the LGPL in its restrictions of modified > copies of the original source (i.e., you can't take an LGPL library, enhance > it, and then sell it). I am unable to let this go unchallenged. There is not any provision in the license language that prevents one from enhancing an LGPL library and selling it. Most likely you meant to say "you can't take an LGPL library, enhance it, and then sell it while hiding your enhancements". That would be a true statement. -S ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption! http://us.click.yahoo.com/CBxunD/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/EbFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Info: <http://www.boost.org> Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl> Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: uBLAS, MTL performance tests.: 00270, Jon Agiato |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: What is wrong with the GLPL?: 00270, Tom Matelich |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: What is wrong with the GLPL?i: 00270, scleary |
| Next by Thread: | RE: What is wrong with the GLPL?: 00270, Tom Matelich |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |