|
Re: uBLAS, MTL performance tests.: msg#00265lib.boost.user
Thanks Joerg, > > This is too much abstraction penalty for uBLAS. Did you define - DNDEBUG > (enabling expression templates and disabling bounds and type checks)? Oh yeah. NDEBUG really makes a difference. Now dense matrix performance rocks. I was confused a bit, cause usually special flag is used to compile debug version, not release one. But it works too as long as one knows about the trick. I will test more with sparse matrices. Regards. Alexei. Info: <http://www.boost.org> Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl> Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: uBLAS, MTL performance tests.: 00265, jhr . walter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: uBLAS, MTL performance tests.: 00265, Jon Agiato |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: uBLAS, MTL performance tests.i: 00265, jhr . walter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: uBLAS, MTL performance tests.: 00265, Jon Agiato |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |