|
Re: solaris gcc 3.2 stlport regexp (bug?): msg#00260lib.boost.user
Ok, I have some more information, some of the problem was due to compiling my application with -shared -fPIC (not the shared library). I got rid of that and the remaining problem was the following reg exp: reg_exp="(\\w+)=(\\{|\"([^\\t\\n\\r\\f\"].*)\"|([^ \\t\\n\\r\\f]+))|\\}|\\{"; in perl : /(\w+)=(\{|"([^\t\n\r\f"]*)"|([^ \t\n\r\f]+))|\}|\{/g Sometimes this line will work and others seg fault/illegal instruction. Changing the reg exp to .*class_name.* works fully. Change it back, segfault. as an aside it is meant to match : field_name="field value " or sub_message_name={ with a whole document made of this format. Does the regexp work on other compilers? Chris ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption! http://us.click.yahoo.com/CBxunD/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/EbFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Info: <http://www.boost.org> Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl> Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: What is wrong with the GLPL?: 00260, Jim.Hyslop |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: What is wrong with the GLPL?: 00260, scleary |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: solaris gcc 3.2 stlport regexp (bug?)i: 00260, c_twiner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: solaris gcc 3.2 stlport regexp (bug?): 00260, John Maddock |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |