Download Firefox: WindowsMac OS X
logo       
Google Custom Search
    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Re: Re: SASL GSSAPI success stories?: msg#00012

Subject: Re: Re: SASL GSSAPI success stories?
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 03:17:29PM -0400, Kevin wrote:
> > Check the SSF (security strength factor) value. It should be 128 for 
> > DIGEST-MD5. You may
> > also just tcpdump the traffic.
>
> Isn't the SSF addressing only the issue of the credentials (as opposed
> to the content)?  I see the same SSF when I use non-encrypted
> connections.  I've tried using tcpdump, but I don't have enough
> experience with it yet to make a clear determination.  Just thought I'd
> see how you were coming to that conclusion.

Check out RFC 2831, section 2.3: (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2831.txt)

(This is the digest-md5 sasl mechanism rfc)

2.4   Confidentiality Protection

   If the server sent a "cipher-opts" directive and the client responded
   with a "cipher" directive, then subsequent messages between the
   client and the server MUST be confidentiality protected.

Section 2.3 is about integrity protection.

So, the client can request confidentiality and integrity protection with 
digest-md5.
And it will protect the whole data exchange, not just authentication.

This was also discussed on a related thread at the cyrus-imapd mailing list:
http://asg.web.cmu.edu/archive/message.php?mailbox=archive.info-cyrus&msg=31051



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>