|
Re: legality infoblox appliance: msg#00022law.gpl.violations.legal
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:10:40AM +0100, Sebastian S wrote: > I recently followed a small talk about the appliance Infoblox > (a dhcp/dns/etc appliance) and talked to one of their technical people > since this product was running linux and I was wondering about the > source code... > now he claimed that since they didn't -add- anything to the kernel > source, but only removed code from it, they didn't have to provide any > source code for this. But as far as I know it's about changes to the > code, not additions. > Could anyone tell me which of this would be true ? You're both wrong ;) The GPL doesn't even say anything about changes. They just have to provide the source. armijn -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- armijn@xxxxxxxx | http://www.uulug.nl/ | UULug: Utrecht Linux Users Group ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Inprocomm and their module, Carlos Martín |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | GPL interpretation for contracters?, Jesse Off |
| Previous by Thread: | legality infoblox appliance, Sebastian S |
| Next by Thread: | Re: legality infoblox appliance, Ed Wilts |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |