|
Re: Re: Rails and Seaside: msg#00184lang.smalltalk.squeak.seaside
On Jan 16, 2006, at 9:20 AM, Blanchard, Todd wrote: The usual rule of thumb in this community is "no bitching unless you want to work on the solution". Nice try. :-) I wanted to help, but Squeak's philosophy is different than mine. I see Smalltalk as a powerful development environment and a VM for running headless server side apps. As for the GUI stuff, I want it to have binding to the native GUI widget. Sort of like the approach that Ambrai takes. -----Original Message-----
Seaside mailing list Seaside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Scriptaculous usage questions: 00184, Julian Fitzell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: Rails and Seaside: 00184, Chris Wong |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: Rails and Seasidei: 00184, Marcus Denker |
| Next by Thread: | [New user] app question: 00184, Timothy Reaves |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |