|
Re: Rails and Seaside: msg#00155lang.smalltalk.squeak.seaside
Just to add my two cents to the discussion. I think that the Squeak "look" is only a minor problem, the main problem is stability and usability. The environment has lot of "small" annoying bugs, and if you have a "image crash" there is not an easy way to recover the last changes like in ENVY. As a developer, this gives me this feeling: the environment looks "unstable" so I don't trust in it to put in a production web site. On the other side VW is very expensive for small web sites (at least here in Argentina where I live). So to make Seaside more popular, I think that a lot of work has to be done "clean-up" Squeak (that is full of spaghetti code). PD: sorry if my post sounds rude, my English is not good. _______________________________________________ Seaside mailing list Seaside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [VW] Porting 2.6a2 - WAWalkbackErrorHandler>>handleError:: 00155, Lukas Renggli |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [VW] Porting 2.6a2 - WAWalkbackErrorHandler>>handleError:: 00155, Avi Bryant |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Rails and Seasidei: 00155, stephane ducasse |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Rails and Seaside: 00155, Lukas Renggli |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |