logo       

Re: Rails and Seaside: msg#00155

lang.smalltalk.squeak.seaside

Subject: Re: Rails and Seaside

Just to add my two cents to the discussion.
I think that the Squeak "look" is only a minor problem, the main problem is stability and usability.

The environment has lot of "small" annoying bugs, and if you have a "image crash" there is not an easy way to recover the last changes like in ENVY.

As a developer, this gives me this feeling: the environment looks "unstable" so I don't trust in it to put in a production web site.
On the other side VW is very expensive for small web sites (at least here in Argentina where I live).

So to make Seaside more popular, I think that a lot of work has to be done "clean-up" Squeak (that is full of spaghetti code).

PD: sorry if my post sounds rude, my English is not good.





_______________________________________________
Seaside mailing list
Seaside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise