logo       

Re: Configuration: msg#00153

lang.smalltalk.squeak.seaside

Subject: Re: Configuration

Well, no, I think it was somewhat stalled even in 2.5. The idea was to make it easier to specify configuration in files so that the same image could be deployed on a test server and a live server for example, or a new image could be deployed in place and take up the configuration the previous image was using.

We wanted to make it easy to define site-wide preferences and then have applications be able to override individual options.

The inheritance was there but we never really got to the file part and never had a good UI for dealing with these inherited properties so it never got used. Avi was talking about stripping down the inheritance model and making it simpler but to be honest I'm not sure where, if anywhere, that got to.

Julian

Brian Brown wrote:

On Jan 2, 2006, at 4:58 PM, Julian Fitzell wrote:

Well, you used to be able to subclass Application but I have a feeling this was deprecated in favour of subclassing session and renderloop... The new configuration stuff never really got fully fleshed out...


So the 2.5 configuration stuff was being reworked for 2.6, but is somewhat stalled? Or is that not really going to be a feature in 2.6?

I never used the 2.5 stuff, but now I would like to ;)

Brian
_______________________________________________
Seaside mailing list
Seaside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise