Avi,
You're right. I timed the script as is and it took 34.7 minutes. When I
commented out Transcript>>show, it ran in 3.3 seconds.
I'm still going to try and play with concurrency and fork this into a
separate process.
Thanks,
Daniel
On Mar 26, 2005, at 4:49 AM, Avi Bryant wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:44:03 -0500, Daniel Salama <dsalama@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi,
I was testing some file I/O reading when I noticed something peculiar.
I posted the following on the Squeak mailing list
(http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2005-March/
090187.html). Because of this finding, I am wondering how well will a
Squeak box perform in a production environment.
Daniel,
Don't jump to conclusions. Transcript>>show: is about the slowest
thing you could possibly be doing to show progress; comment it out and
your code will run several orders of magnitude faster.
Avi
_______________________________________________
Seaside mailing list
Seaside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/seaside
|
