RE: Rolling with Ruby on Rails vs. Seaside

Hi Avi, Colin:

I didn't have to modify anything... It worked just fine...

It is small, simple to use and understand. 

So it is possible so access other data sources than pgsql or mysql.

Cheers,
Pablo.-

> -----Original Message-----
> From: seaside-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:seaside-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avi Bryant
> Sent: Viernes, 28 de Enero de 2005 05:40 p.m.
> To: The Squeak Enterprise Aubergines Server - general discussion.
> Subject: Re: [Seaside] Rolling with Ruby on Rails vs. Seaside
> 
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 17:30:42 -0300, Pablo Iaria <iariap@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > If you only need those basic features of an O-R mapper I think you
> should
> > see Tantalus (written by Colin Putney).
> >
> > I've tested with oracle databases using ODBCSqueak and it worked just
> fine.
> 
> That's fascinating; when we wrote Tantalus, we were solely targetting
> an old version of MySQL (so, for example, it rolls its own
> transactions rather than depending on the database to have them).  Did
> you have to modify it at all to get it to work with Oracle or did it
> really just work?
> 
> Anyway, it's neat that somebody's getting use out of that project; I
> think it turned both Colin and I off of O/R mapping for good :).
> 
> Avi
> _______________________________________________
> Seaside mailing list
> Seaside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/seaside

----------------------------------

Conoce Tutopia, Internet de máxima velocidad, http://www.tutopia.com