logo       

Re: Where Squeak is Headed [was: Module discussion]: msg#00350

lang.smalltalk.squeak.general

Subject: Re: Where Squeak is Headed [was: Module discussion]

Dan Ingalls <Dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> is claimed by the authorities to have written:


> "Under new management"
> Michael shared with me one other topic raised at the OOPSLA BOF, but not
> included in the public report. Here's the wording I saw:
>
> "The suggestion is to hand management of the update stream over to a
> group
> of experienced Squeakers. This group will manage the review and
> publishing
> process and have SqC as advisors in the background.
> Candidates right now are Göran, Doug, Ned and Tim (you did volunteer,
> didn't you? ;-) ). Volunteers, comments, vetos are welcome."
If nominated I will sand, if appointed I will surf. Not like I have a
job or anything to get in the way.... Of course, I could always charge
a licensing fee to support the management fees :-)

tim
--
Tim Rowledge, tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim
Any program that runs right is obsolete.





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise