|
Re: Where Squeak is Headed [was: Module discussion]: msg#00350lang.smalltalk.squeak.general
Dan Ingalls <Dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> is claimed by the authorities to have written: > "Under new management" > Michael shared with me one other topic raised at the OOPSLA BOF, but not > included in the public report. Here's the wording I saw: > > "The suggestion is to hand management of the update stream over to a > group > of experienced Squeakers. This group will manage the review and > publishing > process and have SqC as advisors in the background. > Candidates right now are Göran, Doug, Ned and Tim (you did volunteer, > didn't you? ;-) ). Volunteers, comments, vetos are welcome." If nominated I will sand, if appointed I will surf. Not like I have a job or anything to get in the way.... Of course, I could always charge a licensing fee to support the management fees :-) tim -- Tim Rowledge, tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim Any program that runs right is obsolete.
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Module discussion, Tim Rowledge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Making Squeak Fly (Typing, Protocols, and Traits), Daniel Joyce |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Where Squeak is Headed [was: Module discussion], Roger Vossler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Where Squeak is Headed [was: Module discussion], danielv |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |