|
Re: Making Squeak Fly ( Was: Re: Where Squeak is Headed [was: Module discu: msg#00318lang.smalltalk.squeak.general
>Um, I think I'm inventing my own notation. By "so that A + B ~ B" , I meant >"would the speed improvement from adding J5 and Strongtalk-types to Squeak, be >approximately equal to the speed improvement from just adding J5 to Squeak". I know. Really, Ian would be the best person to answer this, and the StrongTalk folks would have a good sense too. - D >> Let's call the speed gains from typing a la StrongTalk, A, and let's call >> the speed gains from J5, B. >> >>Would J5 and types together equal a speed improvement of A + B? Or does the >>stuff Ian is doing with J5 involve some kind of magic typing >>behind-the-scenes, so that A + B ~ B?
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Making Squeak Fly ( Was: Re: Where Squeak is Headed [was: Module discussion] ), Dan Ingalls |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Croquet, tblanchard |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Making Squeak Fly ( Was: Re: Where Squeak is Headed [was: Module discussion] ), Brent Vukmer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Making Squeak Fly ( Was: Re: Where Squeak is Headed [was: Module discussion] ), John M McIntosh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |