|
Re: [ENH] SMPrLoader-nk: msg#01137lang.smalltalk.squeak.general
Ah, certainly. Hadn't thought for a moment to start changing a RC's interface that much.. goran.hultgren@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > danielv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Yet another wonderful example why viewing a package should dynamically > > select the services that could handle it, instead of having fixed menu > > items, and having to pick the "one right install". > > I know. Let's stick with the current architecture for 1.0 though. > > > A .pr sample would be a nice addition to many packages, not solely an > > alternative distributoon method... > > I know. I have been thinking in those terms too. Attachments to packages > etc. > But let's do that for 1.1 or something. > > regards, Göran
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RB and VI4 (was Re: [ANN] SqueakMap RC2 and SM Loader 0.96 out), danielv |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Newbie questions about Squeak Documentation and Morphic, Albert Wagner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ENH] SMPrLoader-nk, Chris Burkert |
| Next by Thread: | BC + call/cc, Avi Bryant |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |