|
Re: An uncomfortable question: msg#01100lang.smalltalk.squeak.general
Andreas Raab wrote: > Hi Dean, > > Let me drop in a note here. Modules are no DLLs - they are not shared > runtime components. E.g., DLL-hell as we know it from Windows is due to > the fact that no developer can foresee what DLLs any customer may have > installed on his or her system at *runtime*. This is very different from > detecting and handling problems at *development* time. > > Cheers, > - Andreas I think it depends on the point of view: If you look at the Squeak VM coupled with an image as runtime environment running different apps, then parts of the image - modules - may be viewn as some kind of DLLs... If you start multiple Squeaks each running just one app (composed from whatever versions of whatever modules), your argument holds; and then the DLL hell is only outside (for Windows)... Greetings, Stephan <...> -- Stephan Rudlof (sr@xxxxxxxxx) "Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, 'Today I will be brilliant.'" -- Kirk, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4731.3
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: An uncomfortable question, Karl Goiser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [ANN] NetMorph - Morphic on the Net, Masashi Umezawa |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: An uncomfortable question, Andreas Raab |
| Next by Thread: | RE: An uncomfortable question, Stephen Pair |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |