|
Re: ICFP 2002 entry?: msg#01398lang.smalltalk.squeak.general
> If you spend a few minutes to read the task description you will see > that the problem is not *that* difficult: > http://icfpcontest.cse.ogi.edu/task.html Why do you think they feel the need to specify a 64 mb ram limit? or a 1sec at 1.5ghz... Don't those numbers seem awfuly large for a simple program? -- Latancy is your enemy. Bandwidth is your friend. http://users.rcn.com/alangrimes/
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: The standard does *not* support - a removeAll: a - [was: Re: [BUG], Stephan Rudlof |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ICFP 2002 entry?, Bijan Parsia |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ICFP 2002 entry?, Andreas Kuckartz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ICFP 2002 entry?, Bijan Parsia |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |