|
Re: Building Squeak VM Under Mac OS X 10.2 (Jaguar): msg#01373lang.smalltalk.squeak.general
On Friday, August 30, 2002, at 04:44 Uhr, Ned Konz wrote:
...especially as this will also avoid the 40% de-optimzation that GCC 3.1 brings for Squeak. I just tried it out myself, and it seems to be true. ( only 40 M bytecodes/s for 3.1 vs. over 70 M bytecodes/s for 2.95) So: use 2.95, 3.1 simply isn't usable for Squeak (yet). Marcel
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | The standard does *not* support - a removeAll: a - [was: Re: [BUG] Collection>>removeAll:], Stephan Rudlof |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Starting the clock..., Alan Grimes |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Building Squeak VM Under Mac OS X 10.2 (Jaguar), Ned Konz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Building Squeak VM Under Mac OS X 10.2 (Jaguar), Tim Rowledge |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |