|
Re: private methods: your opinion wanted: msg#01321lang.smalltalk.squeak.general
Hi, yampa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 09:30:30 -0500 (Central Daylight Time) Aaron > <reic0024@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Karl Ramberg wrote: > > > > > I think private methods usually are in the > > private category, and not > > > necessary > > > have a selector name indicating it's private. > > > [...] > > > After the original message was posted, I tried > > it out, created a > > class-side method on a class, #pvtInspectMe, > > which simply does a ^ 'hello' > > inspect. I then tried calling it in a > > workspace with Object pvtInspectMe, > > and Squeak told me that it was private, with a > > compilation error. That is, > > it expanded to something like Object *Private > > methods cannot be called > > like this.* pvtInspectMe. > > > > Aaron > > > > > > > The compilation error comes from MessageNode >> pvtCheckForPvtSelector: > encoder, which checks for the 'pvt' at the beginning of the method. This is > what I was asking, that given a clean slate, should code be written to take > advantage of having private methods like this. > > But while I didn't give method categories as an option in the first question, > Karl is right that this is the way it is done most of the time. But it is > kind of a "soft" private, as opposed to a "hard" private that gives an error. > > So, if people prefer categories labeled private to actual private methods, you > can state that too. The reason for preferring soft private over hard private methods lies often in the point stated by Richard in one of his latest posts: _You_cannot_use_hard_private_methods_as_initializers_ That is, the most common usage of them is hindered by the fact that "self new pvtInitialize" is not a self send. If this was not the case i would be using hard private methods all the time. I even considered enforcing private use of private mehtods at runtime (at practically no cost). If someone can help me overcome this limitation i will adopt hard private methods instantly. Just my two cents
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Scrolling tables, Richard A. O'Keefe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Design Patterns and Collection Classes, Torge Husfeldt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: private methods: your opinion wanted, yampa |
| Next by Thread: | Scrolling tables, Richard A. O'Keefe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |