|
Re: Does *anyone* use MVC?: msg#00843lang.smalltalk.squeak.general
Craig Latta <craig.latta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote... > I use MVC in Squeak 2.7, for running the interpreter simulator. As I >recall, the interpreter simulator is broken in later releases. Awk! This is terrible news (but thanks for it!). >I also >use MVC in a variety of releases (including the latest one) on handhelds >when I need a bit more UI speed. I'll stop using releases earlier than >3.2 when the simulator works there, but I'd always like the option of >running MVC (e.g., as a loadable module), if only for historical >interest. If folks will help me out a bit, I'll do all I can to get the simulator fixed in 3.2 asap (I know it's final, but it has an update stream ;-). If it don't run itself, it ain't Squeak. - Dan
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Does *anyone* use MVC? (was: Re: [BUG?] weird behaviour of MVC in Squeak 3.2), Aaron |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Does *anyone* use MVC? (was: Re: [BUG?] weird behaviour of MVC in Squeak 3.2), Ned Konz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Does *anyone* use MVC?, Craig Latta |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Does *anyone* use MVC?, Tim Rowledge |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |