|
Re: Does *anyone* use MVC? (was: Re: [BUG?] weird behaviour of MVC in Squea: msg#00842lang.smalltalk.squeak.general
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Scott Wallace wrote: > But is it really true that there are actually *no* MVC practitioners > using either Squeak 3.2 or 3.3a , no one at all, except Boris? What reasons would an MVCer have to move to a newer version? With the exception of modules in 3.3a, almost everything being done in Squeak versions newer than maybe 2.6 (maybe farther back?) have to do with improvements/additions to Morphic or tools with Morphic-only interfaces. There hasn't been much in the way of enhancements to the core or super new libraries, &c. I may be wrong, but this is what i've noticed. Regards, Aaron
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Does *anyone* use MVC?, Craig Latta |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Does *anyone* use MVC?, Dan Ingalls |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OT] Common Language Infrastructures, Göran Hultgren |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Does *anyone* use MVC? (was: Re: [BUG?] weird behaviour of MVC in Squeak 3.2), Ned Konz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |